Pace v. Amend
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Charles D. Warren and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of August, 1914, appointing a referee to hear and determine the issues herein, without the consent of the appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
Latjghlin, J.: "
The action is brought by afirm of attorneys to recover $100,000 for professional services rendered on a quantum meruit. The allegations of the complaint are brief and merely to the effect that the services were rendered between the 12th day of October, 1912, and the commencement of the action, in which the summons bears date the 7th day of August, 1913, and were performed “in and about the acquisition, development and exploitation of certain patents and the subject-matter thereof, as well as concerning the organization and operation of the defendant Wolfram Wire Company.” The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Lewis v. SnookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Prentice v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Smith v. London Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carroad v. RegensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Gormly v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Thibaudeau v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Runals v. Niagara UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Franceschi v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.