Legal Opinion

Howard Hall Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided April 17, 1941No. 5215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Howard Hall Company, Inc., is an Alabama corporation operating as a motor carrier with offices and principal place of business in Birmingham, Alabama. On February 11, 1936, it filed application with the Interstate Commerce Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the “grandfather clause” of Section 206(a) of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a).

The carrier sought a certificate authorizing “continuance of operation in interstate or foreign commerce, as a common carrier by motor vehicle, of general commodities,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Interstate Comm. Comm. v. Ill. Cent. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Loving v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1969
  2. Howard Hall Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1945
  3. D. B. Ford, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API