Legal Opinion

Loving v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1940No. 245PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

This suit was instituted to suspend an order of the defendant, Interstate Commerce Commission, and to restrain the defendants, United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, from prosecuting plaintiffs for carrying on operations as a common carrier by motor vehicle not authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission, and for which plaintiffs have no certificate.

On February 11, 1936, the plaintiffs filed an application with the Interstate Commerce Commission, by which they sought a certificate of public convenience and necessity under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ace Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1960
  5. Sims Motor Transport Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API