Legal Opinion

Heady v. Tomlinson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1956No. 17790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sparks

Parties will be herein referred to as they appeared in the trial court where defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiff in error was defendant.

Plaintiff Tomlinson was a duly licensed Colorado real estate broker. In May, 1952, the plaintiff was attempting to sell wheat lands in the vicinity of Cope, Colorado, to one Larreau, a prospective buyer. None of the lands which plaintiff had listed were suitable to Larreau. The plaintiff indicated to Larreau that he was badly in need of listings on wheat lands in as much as he had some cash buyers that he was to show lands to on the following day.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babcock v. MerrittColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. BABCOCK v. MERRITTColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Geier v. HowellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Williams v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Williams v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Circle T Corporation v. DeerfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Hayutin v. De AndreaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Cooley Investment Co. v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Carpenter v. FrancisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API