Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Beverly Pyle State Representative 1017 Dorothy Drive Cedarville, Arkansas 72932-9501
Dear Representative Pyle:
I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the following questions regarding authorizing ordinance requirements under A.C.A. § 14-42-107 (Supp. 2007):
1. Must an authorizing ordinance enacted pursuant to A.C.A. 14-42-107(b)(1) specifically address each covered situation on its own merits, or is a blanket authorization allowed?
2. If an authorizing ordinance must specifically address each situation falling under A.C.A. 14-42-107(b)(1)'s general prohibition,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.