Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 17, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Beverly Pyle State Representative 1017 Dorothy Drive Cedarville, Arkansas 72932-9501

Dear Representative Pyle:

I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the following questions regarding authorizing ordinance requirements under A.C.A. § 14-42-107 (Supp. 2007):

1. Must an authorizing ordinance enacted pursuant to A.C.A. 14-42-107(b)(1) specifically address each covered situation on its own merits, or is a blanket authorization allowed?

2. If an authorizing ordinance must specifically address each situation falling under A.C.A. 14-42-107(b)(1)'s general prohibition,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API