In Re: Ethicon, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Ethicon, Inc. (“Ethicon”) appeals from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“the.Board’s”) decision in a merged inter partes reexamination affirming the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 1-17 and 19-23 of U.S. Patent 7,591,844 (“the ’844 patent”). See Boston Sci SCIMED v. Cordis Corp., No. 2014-008135, 2015 WL 883933 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 27, 2015) {“Decision”). Because the Board did not err in its obviousness conclusion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND,
Ethicon owns1 the ’844 patent, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Skky, Inc. v. Mindgeek, S.A.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Celanese International Corporation v. Anhui Jinhe Industrial Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Essity Professional Hygiene v. Cascades Canada UlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Exelixis, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private LimitedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.