Skky, Inc. v. Mindgeek, S.A.R.L.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Skky, Inc. (“Skky”) appeals from the final written decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding concluding that claims 1-3, 5, and 15-23 (“the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent 7,548,875 (“the ’875 patent”) are unpatentable as obvious. MindGeek, s.a.r.l. v. Skky Inc., IPR 2014-01236, 2016 WL 763036, at *1 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 29, 2016) (“Final Decision ”). Because the Board did not err in its claim construction or in concluding that the challenged claims are unpatentable, we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS v. IANCUCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Intercontinental Great Brands v. Kellogg North America CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Mtd Products Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Nobel Biocare Services Ag v. Instradent USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.