Legal Opinion

Pony Express Courier Corp. v. Morris

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 17, 1996No. 04-95-00487-CVPublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Per curiam

This interlocutory appeal questions whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable as a matter of law. Appellants, Pony Express Corporation and Charles Bouie, moved to stay litigation and compel arbitration on the basis of an arbitration agreement with the appellee, Diane Morris. Without an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found the agreement unconscionable and denied the appellants’ motion. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in finding the agreement unconscionable per se, and we reverse and remand.

Summary of Facts

According to Morris’s petition and the appellants’…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Hoover Slovacek LLP v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ski River Development, Inc. v. McCalla, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Williams Industries, Inc. v. Earth Development Systems Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API