Northern States Power Co. ex rel. Board of Directors v. Aleckson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether property owners who elect to require a utility to condemn their property in fee under Minn.Stat. § 216E.12 (2012) are entitled to minimum compensation under *305Minn.Stat. ⅜ 117.187 (2012) and relocation assistance under Minn.Stat. § 117.52 (2012). Appellants are landowners who made such an election after respondents Northern States Power Company, et al. (collectively NSP),1 sought to acquire easements through their property by eminent domain in order to construct a high-voltage electric transmission line. After making this election,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- American National Property & Casualty Co. v. LorenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Guardado v. Guardado MenjivarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Great River Energy v. David D. SwedzinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015