Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1934No. 8 Div. 931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case contained three counts, charging this appellant with the offense of perjury. The indictment appears to be in the form prescribed by section 4556, of the Code 1923, which has been held to be sufficient. Johnson v. State, 3 Ala. App. 98, 57 So. 389; Lawley v. State, 3 Ala. App. 670, 57 So. 96; Maddox v. State, 2 Ala. App. 244, 57 So. 95. The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled.

The alleged false swearing complained of occurred, as insisted by the state, on the trial of the case of State v. Riley (this appellant), wherein he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woods v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Deal v. HubertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Milford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Borden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API