Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1928No. 3 Div. 572PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Section 4622 of the Code of 1923 provides penalties for the violations of certain statutes, one of which we here have for consideration. In this section there is provided special punishment for second and subsequent violations of the prohibition law. In this ease the solicitor in drawing the indictment incorporated an allegation to the effect that the defendant “has heretofore been convicted of violating the prohibition laws of the state.” This averment does not render the indictment subject ,to demurrer, but is proper to put the court on notice that upon conviction it will be the court’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Brannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Abrams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Lyles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Deal v. HubertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gallman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Yates v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Rogers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API