Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Pleasent

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1996No. S96G0338PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this personal injury case in order to consider whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to warrant a jury instruction regarding the assumption of the risk doctrine. Our review of the trial record reveals that there was no evidence introduced that the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the dangerous situation that resulted in his injury, and an appreciation of the risks associated with that dangerous situation. Therefore, we find that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on assumption of the risk, as did the Court of Appeals in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Whitehead v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Myers v. BolemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Turner v. Sumter Self Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. McCrimmons v. Cornell-Young Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Muldovan v. McEachernSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Monitronics International, Inc. v. VeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Trustees of Trinity College v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. FPI Atlanta, L.P. v. SeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API