Royals v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The contention of the defendant that the trial court should have charged, without request, the principles of law set forth in ground 3 of the amended motion for new trial, is without merit. The Code, § 38-306, and the extract from Grace v. State, 49 Ga. App. 306 (4) (175 S. E. 384), could not have been beneficial to the defendant. At the time the statement of Phillips was admitted in evidence, the trial court instructed the jury that they were to consider the statement of Phillips only if they found that there was a conspiracy between the defendant and Phillips to conceal a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- People v. SprangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Shedden v. StilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Smithwick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Conklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- The People v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.