Legal Opinion

Gregg v. Beezer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1927No. 20068. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Gregg, as assignee of St. Joseph’s Sisters of Peace, a corporation, seeks recovery from the defendants, Beezer Brothers, co-partners, upon a settlement and compromise agreement entered into between them, whereby, as it is claimed, Beezer Brothers agreed to hold the Sisters harmless from a claim of NePage McKenny Co., which the Sisters were thereafter held for and compelled to pay. Beezer Brothers’ answer was practically wholly affirmative,, consisting of allegations of fraud and deceit imputable to the Sisters inducing Beezer Brothers to believe that the claim of the NePage…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeillIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Home Insurance v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Pronger v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buttnick v. ClothierWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Terrell v. GotcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Buttnick v. ClothierWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API