TBCH, INC. v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
TBCH, Inc. appeals from a district court order dismissing its appeal from a declaratory ruling adopted by the City of Albuquerque. The declaratory ruling purported to explain the meaning of “completely and opaquely covered” female breasts as that term is used in the City’s Comprehensive City Zoning Code. Under the City’s ruling, TBCH’s property would not be in compliance with the Zoning Code and would consequently have to be relocated. TBCH raises the following issues on appeal: (1) that it is in compliance with the plain and unambiguous language of the Zoning Code, (2)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLONew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- United States Brewers Ass'n v. Director of the New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- United States Brewers Association v. Abe RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lantz v. Santa Fe Extraterritorial Zoning AuthorityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Alba v. Peoples Energy Resources Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Infinity Group, Inc. v. ManzagolNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.