Legal Opinion
Paul Schendel v. Benson M. Curtis, Linda S. Park, and David J. Cosman
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 14, 1996No. 95-1329Published
1Opinion of the Court
83 F.3d 1399
38 U.S.P.Q.2d 1743
Paul SCHENDEL, Appellant,
v.
Benson M. CURTIS, Linda S. Park, and David J. Cosman, Appellees.
No. 95-1329.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
May 14, 1996.
Bruce M. Collins, Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, Princeton, New Jersey, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Scott N. Bernstein.
John P. Isacson, Jr., Foley & Lardner, Washington, D.C., argued for appellees. With him on the brief were Stephen A. Bent and Lawrence M. Sung.
Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Jerre M. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.