Legal Opinion
Busset v. California Builders Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1932No. Docket No. 7084PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This action was instituted by plaintiff to foreclose a lien claimed for work done by him under a subcontract made March 2, 1928, with M. G. Kendall, operating under the name of the California Builders Co., as the general contractor for the erection of a building for the defendant J. W. Helm, to be used in part for stores and offices, in part for a public garage.
Plaintiff’s contract was for the construction of interior walls; and in connection with their answer the defendants filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiff and Frank M. Clausen, who did the plastering under a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Milliken v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Jamison v. LambornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- S. & C. Clothing Co. v. United States Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Ellicott v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Garrett v. McAllister & Royal Securities Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kraft v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Dallman Supply Co. v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Landau v. SalamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Morris v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.