Ellicott v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
The corporation first named as defendant is a Connecticut corporation. The corporation second named is a New York corporation organized under nearly the same name. In 1913 the Connecticut corporation was engaged in the business of buying, selling and shipping coal, with an office in New York city. From July, 1913, to July, 1922, the plaintiff rendered certain services in connection with the buying and selling of coal, the agreed compensation being one-half the gross profits realized upon the coal handled by the plaintiff. In 1920 the New York corporation was organized with a name…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Busset v. California Builders Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Garrett v. McAllister & Royal Securities Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- D'Allesandro v. United Marine Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
- First Construction Co. v. Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Fox Film Corp. v. Wirth & Hamid Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.