Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Nickerson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1984No. CA A24809; SC 29875; SC 29958PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

In this dissolution proceeding the trial court decreed that husband is required to pay $100 per month spousal support for one year, $265 per month child support and entered a $20,000 judgment in favor of wife, as a part of the property settlement, with interest at the annual rate of 15 per cent. The judgment was to be paid in three years; the interest to be paid annually. Husband appealed the support awards and the interest rate, but while appeal was pending he also moved in the trial court to modify the decree as to the support payments pursuant to ORS 107.135(1). He requested that spousal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Carpenter v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Stanaway v. StanawayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Liming v. LimingNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Marriage of Mask v. MaskCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API