Legal Opinion

Nash v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1974No. Civ. 41955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON, J.

Plaintiff Ramona Nash brought this action to recover $50,000 in benefits payable by the terms of a group accident insurance policy issued by defendant The Prudential Insurance Company to the California Institute of Technology, the employer of plaintiff’s husband, Leroy W. Nash. Nash was insured under the policy and died June 23, 1968, in the ocean near Catalina Island. Plaintiff beneficiary contended at the jury trial that Nash met his death by accident. Defendant attributed the death to disease, having pleaded that it was not liable for the loss because death caused by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Slobojan v. Western Travelers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Evje v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Congleton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Oldham v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Life Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. John P. Salas v. The Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API