Legal Opinion

French v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1974No. CR 73-154PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

We find it necessary to reverse the judgment of conviction of appellant of the crime of Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver in violation of Act 67 of 1972 [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1973)] because of the giving of an instruction to the jury which amounted to a comment on the evidence prohibited by Art. 7, Sec. 23 of the Constitution of Arkansas. The instruction was virtually a verbatim recitation of Act 68 of 1972 (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617). It read:

Possession of marijuana (Cannabis Sativa L.) in excess of one ounce shall create a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Rockefeller v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Thiel v. DoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Jones v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Abbott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Milburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API