French v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
We find it necessary to reverse the judgment of conviction of appellant of the crime of Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver in violation of Act 67 of 1972 [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1973)] because of the giving of an instruction to the jury which amounted to a comment on the evidence prohibited by Art. 7, Sec. 23 of the Constitution of Arkansas. The instruction was virtually a verbatim recitation of Act 68 of 1972 (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617). It read:
Possession of marijuana (Cannabis Sativa L.) in excess of one ounce shall create a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Rockefeller v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Thiel v. DoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Jones v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Abbott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Milburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.