Legal Opinion

Zegarski v. Horton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 3, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcobh, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant Vernal Horton, driver of an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding, and the defendant Edward Antonak, driver of an automobile which collided with the rear of the Horton vehicle, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have resulted from the collision. The jury rendered a verdict against both defendants. Both defendants moved to set aside the verdict, and the court denied both motions. Each defendant appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict. *214Antonak assigns error only in a ruling on evidence. Horton assigns…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Buol MacHine Co. v. BUCKENESSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. State v. DortchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Frosch v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Guerrieri v. MerrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Faulkner v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API