Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Reid

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 28, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the parties agree that contributory negligence was not affirmatively alleged by the defendant as a special defense in the pleadings submitted to the jury, the trial judge, never theless, instructed the jury at length in the course of its original and supplemental charge on that issue. The plaintiff was entitled to have the jury correctly, fairly and adequately instructed in accordance with the matters and law in issue by virtue of the pleadings and the evidence in the case. The trial court was in error in submitting to the jury the issue of the contributory negligence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. MacK v. PerzanowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Angelino v. HerseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Zegarski v. HortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Cooks v. O'Brien Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Daley v. Wesleyan UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API