Legal Opinion

In re Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. He maintains an office in Latham, Albany County.

Upon our review of a Referee’s report and the record, we find respondent guilty of 5 of the 10 charges of professional misconduct set forth in the petition, In violation of the Appellate Division attorney disciplinary rules, respondent converted funds held on behalf of clients (see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [5], [7]; DR 9-102 [a] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (5), (7); 1200.46 (a)]). Specifically, from September 1998 until November 1999, the balance in the escrow account…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re KlugermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re NewbouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Fengling LiuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. In re ReulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Matter of AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. In re FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API