Legal Opinion

In re Newbould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1973 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany.

Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the petition and answer *698and having heard respondent at oral argument in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the charges and specifications set forth in the petition, except insofar as they allege a violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (a) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]). The record does not warrant a finding that respondent’s mishandling of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re RaphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re WeinheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API