Legal Opinion

In re Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1983. He maintains a law office in the Town of Clifton Park, Saratoga County.

Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that the pleadings raised no factual issues (see, 22 NYCRR *871806.5) and having heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct as set forth in the petition of charges.

Respondent engaged in a conflict of interest by representing both the sellers and purchasers in a real estate transaction (see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-105…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DiMaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API