State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Purse
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff, superintendent of banks of the State of Ohio, to recover from the defendants, husband and wife, the balance due upon a promissory note executed by the defendants and delivered to the Commerce Guardian Trust & Savings Bank of the city of Toledo, which is now in the hands of the plaintiff for the purpose of liquidation. After issue was joined, plaintiff moved for a summary judgment. The defendants filed affidavits denying the liability of the defendant wife, Maude E. Purse, upon the note. A judgment was entered against both defendants in the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fear v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Seiders v. Merchants Life Ass'n of United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Hinkly v. FreickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Palmer National Bank v. Van DorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Annis v. PilkewitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Lieberthal v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946