Legal Opinion
Olympic Stewardship v. Wash. Growth Mgmt.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 26, 2012No. 40272-6-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
274 P.3d 1040 (2012)
166 Wash.App. 172
OLYMPIC STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION, Appellant,
v.
WESTERN WASHINGTON GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 40272-6-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 26, 2012.
Brian Trevor Hodges, Pacific Legal Foundation, Bellevue, WA, for Appellant.
Marc Worthy, Office of the Attorney General, Mark Robert Johnsen, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
PENOYAR, C.J.
¶ 1 Rivers alter their course over time, a process known as "channel migration." In 2009, Jefferson County (County) enacted a critical areas regulation requiring property owners to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Sprint Spectrum, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Ferry County v. Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Futurewise v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019