Legal Opinion
Harris Methodist Fort Worth v. Ollie
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 26, 2008No. 2-07-122-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, Appellant Harris Methodist Fort Worth (Harris Methodist) contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion to dismiss Appellee Jo Fawn Ollie’s claim and by not awarding reasonable attorney’s fees to Harris Methodist. We will affirm.
I. Background and Procedural History
On June 14, 2004, Ollie underwent a total knee arthroplasty (knee replacement) at Harris Methodist. Ollie alleges that on June 17, 2004, while still a patient at Harris Methodist, she attempted to get out of the bathtub when she fell on the “slippery wet…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Garland Community Hospital v. RoseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Murphy v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Walden v. JefferyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Valley Baptist Medical Center v. Stradley, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Harris Methodist Fort Worth v. OllieTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Tesoro v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- NOWZARADAN v. Ryans, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Dual D Healthcare Operations, Inc. v. Kenyon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.