Legal Opinion

Benedict v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1900No. 435PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. This was a petition by the late District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, for his retiring salary, under Bev1, Stat. § 714, at the rate of $6800 per annum, which the petition avers was the salary which was by law payable to him during the year previous to his resignation. The petitioner acknowledges the payment of $5000 and claims a residue of $1800,. to which he avers himself to be justly entitled..

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. This was a petition by the late District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, for his retiring salary, under Bev1, Stat. § 714, at the rate of $6800 per annum, which the petition avers was the salary which was by law payable to him during the year previous to his resignation. The petitioner acknowledges the payment of $5000 and claims a residue of $1800,. to which he avers himself to be justly entitled.. Upon hearing the case and upon the consent of parties, the Court of Claims found the following facts: “ First. The petitioner, Charles L. Benedict, is…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

By Revised Statutes,. sec. 714, “ when any judge of any court of the United States resigns his office, after having held his commission as such at least ten years, and having attained the age of seventy years, he shall, during the residue of his natural life, receive the same salary which was by law payable to him at the time of his resignation.”

In April, 1865, petitioner was appointed by the President, Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York, and served as.such until July 20, 1897, when he resigned his office, having then held his commission for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Castle v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. NewmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1888

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smith v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Brandon v. AskewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Hooker v. McLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Home Beneficial Life Insurance v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API