Legal Opinion

Gage Bros. & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1912No. 712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 25774 (T. D. 31575).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This was an importation of artificial leaves, grasses, flowers, stems, pompons, paquets, etc., at the port of Chicago. They were classified *428for dutiable purposes at that port under the provisions of paragraph 425 of the tariff act of 1897, which read as follows:

425. Feathers and downs of all kinds, including bird skins or parts thereof with the feathers on, crude or not dressed, colored, or otherwise advanced or manufactured in any manner, not specially provided for in this act, fifteen per centum ad valorem; when dressed, colored, or otherwise advanced or manufactured in any manner, includ-…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Stegemann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. United States v. M. Bernstein & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API