Legal Opinion

BURKAN OIL COMPANY v. Notley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1971No. 43655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice:

There is involved here for review an order of the Oklahoma State Industrial Court awarding the respondent, Charles Clifford Notley, compensation benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act. Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court. The State Industrial Court will be referred to as the “Trial Court”.

Claimant on April 30, 1968 was employed by respondent, Burkan Oil Company, as on oilfield pumper at an oil lease in Osage County, Oklahoma. He was paid a salary of $210.00 per month by respondent for his services.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Cassidy v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Geneva-Pearl Oil & Gas Co. v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Fullhart Maytag Company v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Stoldt Builders, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Goombi v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Fox Building Supply Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Jones v. Shattuck Convalesence/Amity Care Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API