Legal Opinion

Stoldt Builders, Inc. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1964No. 40346PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The award under review adjudicates claimant’s overall condition from an accidental injury to the mid portion of his back and to the left ankle in terms of 12 per centum permament (partial) disability to the entire body. Employer asserts the trial tribunal adopted an erroneous method in calculating the amount of compensation to be allowed. We are urged in a single proposition that “an injury to the foot may not be combined with an injury to the back * * * for the purpose of awarding compensation * * * on the basis of permanent partial disability to the body as a whole.”

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Mudge Oil Co. v. WagnonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Nelson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. J. E. Trigg Drilling Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Consumers Co-Operative Ass'n v. TitusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Farm Fresh, Inc. v. BucekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Transcon Lines v. BrothertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. BURKAN OIL COMPANY v. NotleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API