Legal Opinion

Murray v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an appeal by the surety upon the bond of a removed executor from a decree allowing the third account revising the first and second accounts of the executor.

The contention is made that the surety upon the bond of the executor was not entitled to appeal from the decree allowing the account. It is provided by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 215, § 9, that a “person aggrieved by . . . decree . . . of a probate court . . . may . . . appeal from the same. . . .” It has been held that a person is “aggrieved” within the meaning of that word in this section provided it appears that “he has some pecuniary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monroe v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Bassett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Weer v. GandIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Madden v. MaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Wood v. FarwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Wellman v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. American Can Co. v. Milk Control BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Group Insurance Commission v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API