Legal Opinion

People v. Klimek

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1959No. Crim. 2811PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

The appellants, Harry M. Howser and Edward Klimek, Jr., were accused by an information with the crime of robbery. The jury returned a verdict finding both appellants guilty of robbery in the first degree. Both defendants appealed. However, Klimek has filed no brief or otherwise prosecuted his appeal, although this court notified him that if his brief was not filed within 30 days his appeal would be dismissed under the provisions of rule 17 (a) of Rules on Appeal. Therefore, defendant Klimek having filed no brief and the 30 days having expired on January 5, 1958, his appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. LaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Kleist v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API