Legal Opinion

Ashmore v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. 84-AB-140; CA A31105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is an unemployment compensation case. Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits on the ground that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work and, therefore, disqualified from receiving benefits under ORS 657.176(2)(a). EAB reversed a referee’s decision that found claimant qualified for benefits based on the referee’s determination that claimant had not been discharged for misconduct. We reverse and remand.

At a hearing, the referee heard testimony from claimant and the manager of claimant’s employer, a tow truck…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petro v. EMP. DIV., DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Lewis v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Steinkellner v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Derochier v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Derochier v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Dan McCormack Agency v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Charbonneau v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Exton v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API