Legal Opinion
Dan McCormack Agency v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 25, 1989No. 88-AB-1481; CA A50564PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board that reversed the referee’s decision and awarded claimant benefits. We remand for reconsideration.
The referee found these facts:
“(1) Claimant worked for employer from June 1, 1986 until discharged effective March 14, 1988. (2) Claimant was employer’s sales representative for Reebox [sic] shoes in eastern Washington, northern Idaho and Montana. (3) As sales representative, it was claimant’s responsibility to service the established customers and get new ones. (4) He was to work Monday through Friday from morning to evening until…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- McCann v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Hillcrest Vineyard v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLASCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- City of Grants Pass v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Ashmore v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lemma Wine Co. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Accident Prevention Division v. AsanaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Ligatich v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Waddles Restaurants, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989