Legal Opinion

Derochier v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. 84-AB-15; CA A31039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The issue in this unemployment compensation case is whether the Employment Appeals Board, without offering an explanation, can reject a referee’s finding of fact which is determinative of the award of unemployment benefits. We hold that the EAB erred in failing to base its finding on the record and in failing to explain why it disagreed with the referee or what weight it gave the referee’s determination of claimant’s credibility. We reverse and remand.

On the basis of testimony of the witnesses and his observations at the hearing, the referee found these facts:

“(1) Claimant has filed continued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petro v. EMP. DIV., DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Lewis v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Steinkellner v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Ashmore v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Ashmore v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Exton v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Rulien v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Rulien v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API