Legal Opinion

Mayor &C. of Waynesboro v. McDowell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1957No. 19742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiffs in error state in their brief that the only question for decision by this Court is, “Did the Mayor and Council have a right on February 4, 1957, to amend said zoning law of the City of Waynesboro by a simple majority vote instead of a % vote, as set out in the old ordinance?” This is the only question argued by the plaintiffs in error in their brief, and this is the only question with which we shall deal, all other questions being considered as abandoned.

Plaintiffs in error contend that they did have the right to amend the zoning law by a simple…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aven v. Steiner Cancer Hospital Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Toomey v. Norwood Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. South Georgia Power Co. v. BaumannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Orr v. Hapeville Realty Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Hunter v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barton v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. City Council of Augusta v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Mayor &C. of Waynesboro v. McDowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API