Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Neel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1892No. 3178PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Davidson, J.

*503§ 291. Judgment by defatdt; cannot be set aside at a subsequent term of court. This suit was originally for the trial of the right of property in the county court of Dallas county. The claimant’s oath and bond to the property were filed in the month of April. On the 12th day of May the case was regularly reached and called for trial. The claimant having failed to put in his appearance and prosecute the suit, a judgment by default was rendered in the case. On the 13th day of May; the day following the judgment by default, the claimant made his motion to set aside said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKean v. ZillerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Laird v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. MarpleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Fitzgerald v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Coffman v. National Motor Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Dignowity v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hambleton v. DignowityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API