Laird v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Gonzales. Indictment for exhibiting a gaming table.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The only error assigned, which is relied on, is the overruling of the motion for a new trial. But it does not appear by the record that there was any such ruling in the Court below. There is in the transcript what purports to be a motion for a new trial, signed by counsel; but it does not appear to have been acted on, or brought to the notice of the Court. To authorize the reversal of a judgment, the error of the Court must appear by the record. We cannot presume that the Court erred; on the contrary, it must be presumed that the Court acted in all things rightly, until the contrary appears.…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- White v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Thomas v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Carmichael v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Grubbs v. MarpleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.