Commonwealth v. Cawthron
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGaziano, J.
*674 **613 In this case, we consider whether police officers were required to provide Miranda warnings prior to questioning two individuals who had been detained in a restaurant parking lot as part of a threshold inquiry into a street-level drug transaction. A Middlesex County grand jury indicted the defendants, Keith Cawthron and Craig Flodstrom, on charges of trafficking in Oxycodone, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E ( c ) (1), and conspiracy to traffic Oxycodone, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 40. The defendants filed motions to suppress statements made to detectives and pills found in one…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WardsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. AriasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. GalarzaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.