Legal Opinion
State v. Homan
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2000No. 1999-1107PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 421.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HOMAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Homan,
2000-Ohio-212.] Criminal procedure—Police must strictly comply with established, standardized procedures in administering field sobriety tests—R.C. 2945.72(E) does not extend the time within which a criminal defendant must be brought to trial when the state files additional related charges after the defendant files a pretrial motion. 1. In order for the results of a field sobriety test to serve as evidence of probable cause to arrest, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. McGinty, 08ca0039-M (3-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HoppOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. AslingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Messer, Ca2006-10-084 (11-5-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.