Legal Opinion
Lex Pro Corp. v. Snyder Enterprises, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1983No. 14848PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
This case comes to us on a writ of certiorari. The plaintiffs below petitioned us to review the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that a restrictive covenant in a deed did not run with the land because neither the language of the deed nor the circumstances surrounding its execution indicated that the original covenanting parties intended that the covenant should bind their, successors in interest. Lex Pro Corp. v. Snyder Enterprises, Inc., Ct.App. No. 5880 (Filed February 15, 1983). We granted certiorari and hereby reverse the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Philwold Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Hoover v. WaggomanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- H. J. Griffith Realty Co. v. Hobbs Houses, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pollock v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cypress Gardens, Ltd. v. PlattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Dunning v. BUENDINGNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Peabody Natural Res. Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.