Legal Opinion

Michigan Stove Co. v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1895No. 5233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J. cited : Taylor 'Tilden, 3 Neb., 339; Kellogg v. Huntington, 4 Neb., 96; Nickerson v. Needles, 32 Neb., 240; Hubbard v. Quisenberry, 28 Mo. App., 20. cited: Hilton v.. Doss, 9 Neb., 406; Constitution, sec. 24, art. 1; Code, secs. 908, 950, 988, 1085; Osborne v, Canfield, 33 Neb., 330.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

This action was commenced in the county court by the plaintiff in error on an account for goods sold and delivered in the sum of $169, and on an accepted draft for $150.14. An affidavit for an attachment was filed, alleging that the defendant had disposed of his property with the intent to defraud his creditors. An undertaking in attachment was given, an order of attachment was issued, which was levied upon certain property as belonging to the defendant, and one A. G. Scott was garnished. The defendant moved to dissolve the attachment on the grounds that the affidavit for attachment does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hopkins v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Real v. HoneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Donaldson v. FisherNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weitz v. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lowe v. BishopNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API