Legal Opinion

Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. Curtis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1893No. 4909PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Broady, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action brought in the- county court by plaintiff in error, aided by attachment, against the defendants in error. Prior to the trial a motion was made and *521submitted to the county court to vacate the attachment, which was taken under advisement. Some time after judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the main case, the defendants’ motion to discharge the attachment was denied by tiie county court; and to reverse said order defendants prosecuted a petition in error to the district court, where the decision of the county court sustaining the attachment was reversed, and the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tiedt v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hyslop v. FinchIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Rayner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  5. Milwaukee Iron Co. v. SchubelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  2. Mathews v. HedlundNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hopkins v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Horbach v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Real v. HoneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API