Legal Opinion

Weitz v. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1896No. 6780PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Bush, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This action was instituted in the county court of Johnson county by the Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Company, a corporation, upon a promissory note executed by T. T. Weitz. At the same time a writ of attachment was sued out, and certain chattels of the defendant were attached. A motion was filed by Weitz to discharge the attachment upon two grounds: (1.) The facts stated in the attachment affidavit are insufficient to justify the issuing of the writ. (2.) The affidavit is untrue. This motion Avas heard on numerous affidavits filed in support thereof, and upon counter-affidavits…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Newlove v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Real v. HoneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Claflin v. American National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Leach v. SutphenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API