United States v. Peterson
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Defendant Thomas E. Peterson, Jr. has moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Peterson seeks relief based on Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009), arguing that he was erroneously sentenced as a career offender when, under Chambers, one of his predicate offenses — -failure to report to a halfway house — did not actually qualify as a “crime of violence.” The Court concludes that Peterson’s motion is both untimely and procedurally defaulted, and hence it will be denied.
BAC…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Champion v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. HayesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. HenriquezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Michael Lairy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Michael Lairy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.