Legal Opinion

Walker v. Quemahoning Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1930No. Appeal 173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Claimant, employed by defendant as a coal cutter in its mine, sustained an injury in the following circumstances: He and bis brother were in their working place in the mine on tbe morning of November 6,1928. He bad bored three boles for blasting and bis brother bad prepared tbe shots and had placed them in tbe boles, using an eighteen inch fuse with a stick and a half of grassel. Then each proceeded to light one fuse, using their carbide lights. When tbe brother announced that bis fuse was lit, both men retired to a point of safety. The shot lighted by the brother…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Waite v. Pittsburgh Limestone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Pokis v. Buck Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Iezzi v. IezziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Tappato v. Teplick & Eisenberg Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Palla v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Rolling v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API