Jeffries v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The named defendant1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting aside the verdict and ordering a new trial. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly set the verdict aside, or in the alternative, that it should have ordered an additur pursuant to General Statutes § 52-228b rather than ordering a new trial.2 In addition, the defendant urges us to review this matter under a clearly erroneous standard rather than an abuse of discretion standard. We agree with the defendant that the trial court should have ordered an additur rather than ordering a new trial, and therefore set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Johnson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Creem v. CiceroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Caciopoli v. AcamporaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Krondes v. O'BoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.